yet another relatively decent book ruined

So yes, I am a bleeding heart liberal. And yes, I realize that a dragon is not a person, but when you draw what resembles very strongly a Chinese dragon in a children’s book, and then name him Ching-Chung:

dragon 001

I become very unhappy. And this is a reprint of an older book. Did no one think Hmmm…. this is our chance to go with a less racist sounding name?

In any case, wikipedia tells me that Tianlong is a heavenly, celestial dragon. So I got my Sharpie out and:

dragon 002

Stupid racist children’s books.

Comments

  1. Lydia

    ugh… this is the worst. I wish there was a comment system for books wherein you could pass feedback like this on. However, you finding Tianlong did make me think of Naomi Novik’s Temeraire novels (Napoleonic War + Dragons). Probably not at all your style, reading-wise, but great fun nonetheless (and much more appropriate and non-racist, to boot!)

  2. Post
    Author
    reluctantm

    No promises, but I will try one of those dragon books. I often read books for people like my mum or my sisters to see whether I should buy them as presents. The dragons + history story might be good for my mum. She really likes fantasy like that.

    Remind me again in a few months if I haven’t tried these yet please.

Comments are closed.