Month: January 2015

Review of Katamari Volume One by Alex Culang and Raynato Castro

On Netgalley the other day, after checking off I reviewed The Book of Strange New Things, I mosied on over to the Graphic Novels or Comic section or whatever it’s called. I don’t think I’ve ever really looked there before, since there is really no point in reading comics on my teeny kobo and I generally can’t be bothered to read things on the iPad. So I wasn’t expecting much, but then:

A Katamari comic! (NB: this picture is not from the comic but from deviantart.)

Even better, a Katamari comic that I didn’t even have to request. It was free free free to anyone who wanted it. You better bet I was going to roll that comic up into my life.

(For those unfamiliar with Katamari Damacy, it’s a series of Japanese video games in which one is a diminutive green prince with a sticky rolling ball that collects objects on Earth under the watchful eye and abusive tones of his gigantic king father. It’s quite Japanese and beneficial to play prior to visiting any place in urban Japan. I’m pretty sure the only thing that got me through my first two jetlagged days of Tokyo was pointing out, ad nauseum to Geoff and Lydia, objects that I had, at one point, rolled up in a Katamari game.)

The book brings together a collection of webcomics, a few story arcs, and a few one-offs (including flow charts on whether or not you are trying to roll things up with a Katamari or a blueberry). The stories are cute and very much in the style of the Katamari universe. There is the king, a cameo by the queen, many cousins, Michiru (the little girl who is always talking about feeling the cosmos in the first game), Jumboman, cutie animals, they’re all there. The colours are as vibrant and the corners, metaphorically and literally speaking, are as cutely rounded as they are in the game. Comics are a logical step to continue the Katamari universe; I can only imagine the sheer number of adjectives necessary to write a Katamari novel. There is a lot of detail in the panels, most of which I overlooked until I read the creators’ commentary; the book is structured a bit like a “director’s cut” with Culang and Castro writing little blurbs on most pages about the story or what is hidden in the panels. Generally, I don’t read comics correctly as I only ever read the text bubbles and never give the pictures more than a peripheral glance, so having reminders to actually look and see what is happening is helpful to text-intensive lovers like me.

The commentary, however, ends up a double-edged sword. One joy of Katamari is how genderless it can feel. There are a slew of male characters, but, outside the story line, the game is not testosterone-driven, angry, or violent (other than the cops that shoot at your Katamari and a few Hey’s, no one quite seems to mind being rolled up). It’s just a colourful, fun, way to spend a few hours. But the commentary of the creators lends a definite lad feel to the whole comic, likely not in an intentional or an exclusionary way, but there’s definitely a more masculine feel to the comic than to the series. While there are some girl cousins chosen to go on the adventures (Daisy and June in particular) and Michiru is around, I still get the default to male feel, i.e. that anything that isn’t specifically gendered is masculine. Then, once I started thinking that, I couldn’t stop. Then not even the colours of a Royal Rainbow could cheer me up.

As for reading it on my iPad, not a fan. I have one other comic I got to read on my iPad, and then I think I’m done. The font is too small for my firmly-ensconced-in-my-thirties eyeballs, and it’s a hassle to have to keep zooming in and then zooming back out to turn the pages. It would seem that an iPad is a perfect container for comics, but maybe the ratios just aren’t right yet, or trying to smush a webcomic meant to be read on a big monitor into a tiny one is beyond the capabilities of current aesthetic technology. I think this book deserves to be big and glossy and coffee-table size for optimal viewing.

Still, KA-TA-MA-RI!

Katamari Volume One by Alex Culang and Raynato Castro went on sale January 2, 2015.

I received a copy free from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.

Review of The Book of Strange New Things by Michel Faber

This is a type of book that you really wish you could rate in parts, like pages one through one hundred are 3/5, pages one hundred through three hundred and fifty are 2/5, and pages three hundred and fifty to the end minus one are 4/5. End isn’t the great. It’s a book outside my comfort zone (science-fiction and religion) and it’s a book that’s too long. It’s a book where some of the surprises are obvious and where one of the surprises manifested itself in a way I wouldn’t have expected (the Oasans physiology with respect to healing in particular).

So this is a book that goes here and there. A book where I got frustrated and then I got surprised and then frustrated again.

We are focused on Peter, a Christian preacher of indeterminate denomination (I think he says he’s not Baptist or Lutheran and he isn’t Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox) who is sent to another world to minister to the local species of a faraway planet, under the employment of a somewhat sinister, somewhat benign corporation. Peter leaves his wife Bea behind, but gets to communicate with her via a sort of internet contraption, which is seemingly the only nod to modern technology in the novel (that and the space travel, I have to concede). Bea on earth never mentions WiFi, rarely mentions cellphones, there doesn’t appear to be tablets or smart phones or Internet. Is this an alternate past? I mean, first world people freak out when they can’t get twitter for an hour, so one would assume that the first sign of societal collapse would be the collapse of telecommunication infrastructure, but that isn’t even mentioned. Perhaps Faber does what I aspire to do more of: live without all the trappings of constant contact, so this isn’t a concern for him in his books. But it’s the little things like this that make all of The Book of Strange New Things feel off.

Anyway, I started the last paragraph about Peter. We know that Peter is a complex person because he used to be a drug addict. Ooooooooh. Put in the scary Just say no kids music from those eighties drug advertisements. Then he found Jesus through Bea. And now he is definitely in the running for Most Boring Protagonist of 2014. He’s just completely bland. His struggles are, relatively, nonexistent. Bea graciously (at the start) accepts his interplanetary mission, the Oasans readily accept him and a large group are eager to learn about Jesus, he has a beautiful woman on the space base looking out for him and rescuing him from many of his more idiotic endeavors. Peter pretty much gets whatever he wants and chalks it up to his deep-rooted belief in prayer. I don’t understand Faber’s endgame here. Does he mean this book to be an active call to a Christian life? Peter gets what he wants because he truly believes and prays. When other people don’t get what they want, it’s because they aren’t praying hard enough. Then, when they do pray, truly and meaningfully, better things happen (like the impromptu garbage pickup Bea writes about; I know that sounds bizarre, it makes sense in the context of the story). Is it just a story? A Christian allegory? The meaning is muddled. We’re back to being muddled.

The scientists at the colony are cutouts that would be more interesting than Peter, but who aren’t delved into much. There’s a subplot about a linguist who goes missing that sort of peters out. Pages and pages are devoted to how well the vetting process is for the mission, only to have one character have a breakdown that exists, it seems, only to add impetus to Peter’s narrative. And then when Peter gets muddled, he prays (of course) and realizes the answer. Then the book ends, unsatisfactory, although the unresolved ending might be a way of setting up a sequel.

This book is very much like a flatline, slow burn. Much is said about how the terrain of the planet is flat, unchanging, soaking in and not giving back, all descriptors you could apply to this book. It’s interesting conceptually, but in practice, there needs to be more depth. The book needs to be simultaneously longer and shorter. And the book needs some of the characters to have at least a little more pizzazz, not just loner scientists and ministers whose pasts are supposed to make them exciting rather than having anything innately compelling in their own personalities.

The Book of Strange New Things by Michel Faber went on sale October 24, 2014.

I received a copy free from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.

what I’m going to write January 2015

It shouldn’t take any reading between the lines for you to know that I’m not particularly enamored with the end-process of writing lately. Yesterday I got a rejection saying my story was too plot focused. I can’t win. I write things that don’t have enough plot. Now I write things that have too much plot. I feel like giving up.

So I am. For January at least. I’ll keep working with my online writing group (my FtD-peeps, you know who you are!) and I’ll write a plot outline for my wolf children story. But other than that, I’m just going to read books and make some soap (I ordered ginger ale fragrance oil and will make some ginger ale smelling soap.) I might play Nethack and watch a lot of Netflix. But I think I’m done with writing for at least January.

I knew writing would be hard, but I never thought it would be this hard. I thought I would just go along the way I was in 2013, small magazines, online ones, new ones, but that wasn’t the case for 2014. I don’t have much hope for 2015 either. My writing is better than average (over the entire six billion population of the world) but lower than publication level right now. So I’m going to step back.

See you fiction-writing in February!

(I’ll still write book reviews and random writing thoughts here. Don’t fret. I won’t vanish forever.)

Review of Almost Famous Women by Megan Mayhew Bergman

So, the first burning question: would I have ranked this book higher or lower if she spelled her first name the same way I do? I can’t recall meeting another Meghan, so I don’t know how I’d feel about that.

Now that that’s out of the way, let’s get to reviewing.

Almost Famous Women is a book of short stories about (wait for it) almost famous women. Conjoined twins, heiresses, female’s pushing against the norm. Lots of lesbians or, at least, women interested in women as well as other men. Race car drivers, ambulance drivers from World War One, high divers, dancers, the sister of Edna St Vincent Millay. All women, all the time. Nothing wrong with that. I like women. I like pretending I’m rich and living in 1950s London (especially so close after my re-read of The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets). Or on a private island near Cuba. The little hints of the exotic are what give the stories momentum. A quick read. I read most of the book on an airplane.

But then, Almost Famous Women is also full of completely self-involved, unlikable, egotists. Yes I know, we’re not supposed to want to be friends with fictional characters, but it’s hard to really feel compassion for someone who denies her servant medical care to prove a point or to not ruin a party or, really I have no idea why Joe (who’s female, just got a masculine name) doesn’t want to take Celia for medical aid. It’s hard to feel much for someone who sells her coat for morphine and then rubs the fact her lone friend’s face. It’s hard to feel for a painter who is miserable to everyone around her out of obstinacy only. These women, and most of the stories are based on real women, skirted the edges of propriety, eager to be iconoclasts, but at the same time, many can only be described as unpleasant people, grating and aloof. Most of the stories aren’t long enough to go deeper than that initial repulsion and many of the stories end, it seems, mid-thought. Sure, the sentence ends, but they’re all so abrupt. My kobo is full of my notes of Why end here? and Another brusque ending. It’s almost discourteous of the author to give such tantalizing hints at characters that could engage the reader, and then yank it away by ending the story and starting anew. It makes this collection feel less like a collection of stories and more like a collection of architectural plans of stories: with imagination you can see what the roof will be like and the shingles and where the bath will go, but it isn’t real yet. Or is that the point? A short story should leave you wanting more? But these feel incomplete, so I don’t think it works.

But of these story/plans, what did I like? My favourite stories in this one: Expression Theory or The Pretty Grown-Together Children. Funnily, they are the ones that are the least solid in terms of time passing or reality or any of that jazz. Maybe the book could have used with some actual jazz music. In a way, it reminds me of difficult-to-approach music like that.

Almost Famous Women by Megan Mayhew Bergman went on sale January 6, 2015.

I received a copy free from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.

challenge 2015

I found this this challenge on the Literal Life blog and thought why not. So I started a tally in a google spread sheet, which I may have made shareable, or maybe I haven’t (click and see). The numbers in Column O correspond to books that satisfy that condition under Column A (i.e. book number 2 is The Book of Strange New Things, another book I have to get a review up for but I’m just not getting there quickly, so the rows in Column O that have a ‘2’ in them means book number 2, The Book of Strange New Things satisfies that condition. This is too much explanation of the obvious, isn’t it.).

So that’s what I’ll do this year. At the end of the year, I’ll try to see if I can find a subset wherein no book is used in more than one category. There will be math involved. But that’s not until 2016 so you needn’t worry too much if you don’t like math, which you shouldn’t, i.e. you should like math. Math is nice and just goes putt putt putt putt along. Maybe I should have stayed more in math.

December 2014

I read:

Thoughts:

  • The Complete Stories by Flannery O’Connor: I found these hollow compared with the Frank O’Connor collection I read in November, not that that is bad, just she treats her characters differently than O’Connor does. There’s a pattern to how some of the stories end – a sharp drop. I have similarities in many of my stories’ endings too so it’s helpful to see examples of differentiated sameness.
  • Nathaniel Fludd Beastologist: Flight of the Phoenix by R.L. Travers: Tesfa liked this book. I was more meh.
  • The Passion by Jeannette Winterson: Not my favourite Jeannette Winterson (still Why Be Happy When You Could Be Normal), but a good Jeannette Winterson in any case.
  • Confessions of a Sociopath by M.E. Thomas: I don’t really know what I expected. Actually, I guess I do, I thought I’d be entertained, but for all of the author’s professing how likable and intriguing she is, my goodness is she a braggart and a bore. This is a very dull book.
  • The Russian Debutante’s Handbook by Gary Shteyngart – What is the purpose of the whole first half of the book, the part set in New York? Nothing really happens until he goes to Prava, and even then, what happens is just a random collection of musings on former Soviet biznesmen and wealthy yet dim ex-pats. There are echoes of say, Bulgakov, in the second half, but by then I had trouble keeping focused and just rushed through to the end because I felt bad on giving up on the book. As another review on librarything said: Am I supposed to spend the course of the entire book hoping Vladimir gets offed by the mafia? If I am, the book’s succeeding amply, but if not…
  • An Untamed State by Roxane Gay: I had to keep putting it down, or flipping to the end, like Room, because it was stressing me out too much.

    Even though there were tonnes of reviews of An Untamed State all summer long, I don’t think I read any of them because I was totally surprised by the plot. Maybe that’s better. Maybe I should read less reviews and just read books randomly.
  • One More Thing: Stories and Other Stories by B.J. Novak: Some people are, unfairly, funnier than me.
  • Watch How We Walk by Jennifer LoveGrove: We’ve read this story before, the story of leaving a fundamentalist household. There’s nothing new here in terms of plot or pacing. But stories can be told again and again. There’s nothing wrong with that. There’s nothing wrong with reading a familiar story with variations as long as the variations are enough to keep my interest. The Emily in the now sections aren’t as interesting as the Emily in the then sections. I feel bad for all the characters, so trapped. Their hopelessness shines through in the writing.
  • The Opposite of Loneliness by Marina Keegan: In the introduction, Anne Fadiman writes that Marina Keegan wrote like a 21 year old. Sure she does but, realistically, I don’t want to read the thoughts of a privileged, white 21 year old at Yale. Other bits I thought were decent, or better than decent, good. I would have liked the underwater one to be a whole claustrophobic novel. Or a movie, although I don’t know how a movie taking place completely in the dark would actually work. It sounds like it could be a James Incandenza sort of film.
  • The Treatment Mo Hayder: The cover said it was supposed to be Completely terrifying. I think I’m jaded. It wasn’t terrifying at all. But then again, I tend to get scared more about stupid things like alien abductions, so maybe I’m the wrong audience.
  • The Journalist and the Murderer by Janet Malcom: Maybe I would have found this more compelling if I had a background in journalism. It was a quick read but very little stuck.
  • Almost Famous Women by Megan Mayhew Bergman: There will be a full review of this up hopefully by the end of the week.
  • The Woodcutter by Reginald Hill: So we’re just going to drop the whole child-porn video plot? Shouldn’t they still care about the video once guy got cleared?

    And talk about white male fantasy, the young, POC, sexy psychiatrist goes off with the grizzled and deformed old man at the end. Blech.
  • The Pickup by Nadine Gordimer: Slow, almost tortuous to read with a plot that is essentially, a meditation on the same thing as Common People by Pulp. Worthwhile but tough.
  • Paris Trout by Pete Dexter: I saw the movie years ago, and the movie cuts out a lot of the book for the better, because the second half of the novel drags whereas the first half is much more snappy. I actually am struggling to remember what happens in the second half. I spent the last five minutes thinking and came up with it, but the first half is better.



Favourite book of the month:



Most promising book I put on my wishlist:

I want to get this book and do the things with Tesfa.



I watched:

Thoughts:

  • Bletchley Circle: This is my new in the background while I wash dishes show.
  • Two Lives: liked how they didn’t make it a big twist at the end, but it did get more and more outlandish the longer it went on (the last ten or so minutes especially).
  • Wolf Children: Nice but should have been about 20 minutes shorter.



Listened to: Serial, although I feel kinda slimy about it. I feel bad for everyone involved. Maybe it shouldn’t have been an entertainment. Maybe it will help find out the truth. Maybe it’s just voyeuristic with no merit. I don’t know.



I wrote: Proofread Chagall story. Typed spoiled milk story. Thought of my own Wolf Children story in my mind, same with a story about being stuck in time, although I might just be mining a repressed memory of Groundhog Day.



Published: Nil. Rejections though, so people are reading what I write, just saying no.

First ten pages

Actually a cheat since my copy starts on page four so I read from pages four through ten.

So they might be at a party? Or a museum? Those were the impressions I got. I doubt it really matters in the end since there don’t seem to be any characters yet or they are and they are drunk? I’m really not sure.

I’ll update again around page one hundred.

last 2014 stat and reading for 2015

According to my librarything stat’s, I read 61 326 pages in 2014. As for goodreads, I can only get three books to show up in my 2014 stats, so I don’t know what the what is going on.

So it’s 2015. That means: ten pages a day of Finnegan’s Wake. I have zero interest in understanding this book. I just want to finish it so I can lord it over Geoff until he or I die, whichever comes first. I should see if I can get a little ticker and update it as I go.

I am far more excited about the ticker possibilities than the actual James Joyce slog.