Month: March 2013

reading around the world – Burma

Burma: The Lizard Cage by Karen Connelly

Thoughts: Sometimes you read a book that is good and meaningful and important but it doesn’t do a single thing for you. This book, about a political prisoner in a Burmese jail was like that. Something held me back from really melting into the story, into the characters, into the time and the place. Again, like earlier this month, I can’t say a single thing that didn’t work if we attack this book from a technical standpoint. It’s just me and this book aren’t going to be friends.

Rating: 3/5

“…the unknowability of … Africa”

I finished reading When A Crocodile Eats the Sun. Andrew Solomon has blurbed the back with what I put above: the unknowability of Africa. Seriously? Have we not moved past Heart of Darkness thinking of Africa yet? Moreover, it makes no sense while applied to his book written by an African about Africa in which he details stuff that happens in Africa to Africans. I am unclear as to how presenting data and stories about Africa contributes to unknowability; in my opinion, it contributes to the opposite, namely knowability.

I have been to Africa twice (Ethiopia and South Africa). Is it different than here? Yes. But I find everywhere is different than here. I even find parts of Canada different than here (Calgary is a lot different than the Maritimes, except for the large number of Maritimers out there working). Was it unknowable? Only in the sense that anything that isn’t your norm is unknowable for everyone. I’m sure if you took some of the people I met in Africa and dropped them here in New Brunswick, New Brunswick would be unknowable to them. Yet we don’t perpetuate the unknowability of Atlantic Canada around the world.

It also implies in the blurb that Philip Gourevitch also wrote about the unknowability of Africa, I am assuming in reference to We Wish to Inform You that Tomorrow We Will Be Killed with Our Families, which is also a book where it discusses Africa, specifically the Rwandan Genocide, in a very non Heart of Darkness unknowability fashion.

Are people so blinded they expect Africa to be unknowable? The internet tells me there are over one billion people living in Africa. I bet each one of them knows something about the place they live. Can we stop pretending that Africa is just this impermeable mass when we talk about it? Completely othering and, as I’ve said, it didn’t even apply to this book. Maybe blurbers just skim through. I’ve never blurbed (or been blurbed) so I don’t know.

workshopping alone

Two days ago, I got news that one of my stories has been accepted at The Rusty Toque. Today I submitted a story for Sarah Selecky‘s Little Bird Writing Contest. The pieces are dichotomic. The first, I wrote in a fit of pique while annoyed with feeling unwelcome in my own home. It’s short (funnily 666 words long). If I had to pick a word (other than bone-crushingly depressing, which is actually two words) to describe the first story, it would be spiky. Everything juts out and sticks into flesh and there is nothing internal about it.

The second, well, the second I workshopped alone to death and now I don’t even like it, but I submitted it anyway because I told myself I would. It’s like one of those rubber, bouncy super-balls. It’s almost glossy and the glossiness has rubbed away anything authentic. The piece isn’t bad in the way that some of the things I’ve read in my life are bad, it just seems over-workshopped, which is funny since I workshopped it by my lonesome. I shouldn’t complain about it because I’m sure in some internet/karmic way, complaining about my story will mean I won’t win (which, is likely I won’t anyways because there are lots of submissions and not all can win). But I feel like I made this story accessible, but I haven’t yet learned how to make my writing be my writing and accessible at the same time. It’s funny how I can accept awkwardness in my first piece, but the second piece leaves me uncomfortable and ready to disown it entirely.

So we’ll see. Spiky and awkward versus smooth but inauthentic. I’m putting myself out there. Following through. Accepting not always winning. All those sentences that should be on a motivational poster, I’m doing them. Maybe it’ll work out in the end.

And it is Friday – in three weeks, I will be in a big city which has Ethiopian restaurants. Oh, messer wot, I am coming for you soon.

In which I am brainwashed by romantic story arcs in American sitcoms

Last month, with the return of Community, Bitch wrote a piece discussing the ridiculousness of will they/won’t they hookup storylines. I read it, agreeing with every single point.

Then I started watching Parks and Recreation on Netflix and got really emotionally invested in April and Andy’s relationship.

Then I got even more emotionally invested in Leslie and Ben’s relationship.

Now I’m watching The IT Crowd and all I can think is Ooooooh, I hope Roy and Jen get together (sorry Moss). Seriously? It doesn’t even make sense why they would. How am I so brainwashed that I expect romantic story arcs in shows in which there is not need for a romantic story arc? My only guess is that I have never written a story where people end up together so it’s like this perverse voyeurism for me to see people happily ever after. I am actually sitting here trying to think if I have ever written a story where people are happy together at the end. I guess Merry Fucking Christmas no one breaks up or cheats on their partner or has awkward sex with someone who doesn’t really care about them. That’s sadly the best I can do.

Oh and best wedding I’ve ever been to: Jim and Pam’s on The Office. Something may be seriously wrong in my brain.

the books which are good but which I don’t like

I never know what to do when I am reading a book that is, for all the ways you can think of “good” meaning, is good (good characterization, realistic dialogue, great pacing, intelligent story), but that I don’t like. Currently, I am reading Above All Things and while every word I read reinforces that this should be a great book, I am not enjoying reading it. I can say books are like people and sometimes you meet people and you’re just not friends, not matter how hard you try, but I want to enjoy books that are well written with engaging story lines, not feel like I have to slog through it before the library return date.

Con with Above All Things: It reminds me of my longer story, but my longer story is on my brain so everything reminds me of my longer story.

Pro: This quote

None of it seemed appealing, the parties where I’d stand off to the side, the dinners talking about how wonderfully proud I must feel.

As a wife of an academic of whom not one other academic at his new job has asked me what I do, I know how this feels. Although, if they did ask me what I did and I told them about letting my PhD to collect dust so I can be a writer with six stories published online, yeah, I doubt they’d think much more of me with that.

Should I quit? Should I keep going? If it’s a good book, maybe I’ll learn something even if it doesn’t feel like there’s any spark between us. Or maybe I should cut my losses and go re-read a book I know I love again to perk myself up.

44250

An issue with writing stories in longhand is the fact that longhand doesn’t magically translate itself into typed without effort. But today, after much effort and only finishing twelve days after I’d hoped (February was too full of sickness and February despair to stay on target), I finished typing up my longest piece so far (see title for nice, round word-count).

Is my longer piece good? It could be better, of course. This is really only draft one.point.five. Could it be longer? Probably needs to be. The ending scenes with Peter are rushed because I was more focused on finishing than goodeding.

Even if this piece never amounts to anything, I should feel happy I got to the end of draft one.point.five at least. Now I will put it in a drawer and ignore it for a month. Writing it and typing it is nothing compared with the massive amount of editing, fixing, rewriting, junking, and starting over that has yet to occur.