books

Ten Books That Stuck With You Meme

Because right now, all I’ve got to do is keep my kitten alive, so why not?  I will also impress you since I can remember where and when I bought most of these books, yet somehow cannot remember to buy butter when I go to the grocery store.

  • 54489718bc0571559686d766567434d414f4141Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace:  This was actually Geoff’s book, an Ed recommendation.  He read is back around 2002, after buying a second hand copy at Old Goat Books.  I then proceeded to use it as a doorstop until 2011, when I figured that maybe I should read it rather than continuing to have the cover bleach from having sat face up in the sun nine years. Initially, I made the mistake of trying to bring the book to work, to read on the O-Train. After one day, and a sore back, I gave up on that and put the book away. Still feeling guilty, a week or so later I started again, this time just in bed. I read the first hundred pages and put the book down. Then, on a bunch of bunch of connecting flights to a work conference, where the flight attendant saw it and asked me whether I was reading a medical textbook, from the small font and footnotes, I read the first hundred pages again. Then a third time. Convinced I was good to go now, I read more during a ten hour wait at the San Diego airport. I read more in Jamaica, on the porch while being bitten by mosquito after mosquito. I read more in the hotel waiting for my grandmother’s funeral. At one point, having been given money to buy food, instead I went to the only book store I could find to see if they had any more David Foster Wallace. Basically, if you don’t know I live this book, then you haven’t been reading this blog for very long. Bonus: Infinite Jest Found Poetry!

  • 118760A Time of Darkness by Sheryl Jordan: This is not a good book. I’m not going to try and convince you that it is, except to say that twelve year old me thought this book was the most mindblowingly amazing book ever written. I was going to name my kids after the characters in the book, and, considering they were named Rocco and Ayoshe, that’s a pretty big commitment right there. Not being very outgoing (and hence not very popular) in middle-school, I would stay in my bedroom and read and re-read this book over and over again. I must have got it from a Scholastic order or the book sale at my school. I still have my copy. Maybe I’ll read it again to marvel at how far my tastes have progressed since tweendom.

  • 0006395163.01._SX140_SY224_SCLZZZZZZZ_The People’s Act of Love by James Meek: I don’t actually own this book. Even though there’s a scene near the beginning that makes me all quesfyefeflj all over (and not necessarily the scene one might expect; mine involves toe nails), I take it out of the library every now and then and think I should really buy it for all the times I’ve read it, but I haven’t yet. When I mention it to people, most think I’m talking about The History of Love and then talk to me about that book instead, a book I didn’t like. This one is like reading Doestoevskii without the time commitment.

  • 787580ee718d8f2592b71355577434d414f4141Restaurant at the End of The Universe by Douglas Adams: This is my favourite Hitchhiker’s Guide book. I read it again and again in high school, not bothering so much with the prequel or sequels. The big Don’t Panic smiley on the back of my copy was helpful to bring around during exam time, when I would get super stressed. I’d bring it in and prop it up on the desk in the gymnasium for whatever exam I was writing (except OAC Economics, which I wrote in the Cafetorium). I struggle to write humour and I don’t laugh much. But I laugh at this. I guess I like absurdity. Or maybe I just dislike reality.

  • 0399c2492af1fd0593634395a41434d414f4141Fieldwork by Mischa Berlinksi: This is a library book that I think I just picked up randomly from Keshen Goodman and brought on vacation with me when Geoff and I did our France/London/Slovenia trip of 2008. It’s a world-building novel that is neither fantasy nor sci-fi but literary fiction, completely imagined but realistic, about an anthropological/sociological study of a tribe in Thailand. I read this on the spare bed in a hotel room in the Hôtel du Golf while Geoff was at a conference. Do Not Disturb hung on the door and stealing rolls of toilet paper from the housekeeping cart left by the elevators. I ate eight types of cheese one day and fell in and out of sleep while reading. I’ve never met anyone else who has read this book.

  • 0307379205.01._SX140_SY224_SCLZZZZZZZ_How To Live Safely in a Science Fictional Universe by Charles Yu: So this is a world-building novel that is sci-fi, but less sci-fi as it’s focus and more sci-fi as that’s the way the story fell; it’s about the people in the sci-fi universe rather than the sci-fi universe itself. It’s another of my You should read this books that only one person has ever taken me up on.



  • bjBridget Jones: The Edge of Reason by Helen Fielding: This I got from the discount pile at a Chapters in Waterloo. The sticker’s still on my copy: $5.99. I had a period in 2003 when this was the only book I read. I’d start, finish, then start again. It’s less satirical than the first Bridget Jones but nowhere near as shlocky as the third Bridget Jones. If anything, it can be read as a warning against becoming an unwitting drug mule in Southeast Asia.

  • 0156013983.01._SX140_SY224_SCLZZZZZZZ_Le Petit Prince by Antoine de St-Exupéry: This was one of the first French books that I read all the way through (excepting the abridged-to-seventy-pages books we read in late French Immersion, like Les Misérables abridged to seventy pages, which was quite a feat; Javert didn’t even die in the version we read). I feel sort of silly admitting to how much I like this book, since it’s a book written explicitly to tug at your emotions, but I can’t help it. I like it. I like looking up at the sky and imagining a Prince and his rose on a tiny planet far away.

    Anyone remember The Little Prince TV show? It used to be on TVO before Belle and Sebastian? I think my love for Anime stems from those two shows.


  • 0749311207.01._SX140_SY224_SCLZZZZZZZ_Adrian Mole: From Minor to Major by Sue Townsend: This I bought in a bookstore in Kingston, Ontario, but I’d read and read and read the first two books in compilation before, having taken them out of the library and surprising my mother, who’d read them and watched the TV series when we were in England. I guess she didn’t think Adrian had made it across the pond. But this bigger Adrian Mole collection, I’ve read it so many times the binding is coming loose and every single page has either had its corner folded down or something spilled or dropped onto it. I suspect I was a bit like Adrian – thinking myself to be intellectual when, in reality, all I was was naive. Case in point: When I went to visit Geoff’s relatives, who, at the time lived near Leicester, I asked them if there was an Adrian Mole statue in Leicester I could go visit. There isn’t. That was an awkward way for me to introduce myself to Geoff’s relatives.

  • 000648512X.01._SX140_SY224_SCLZZZZZZZ_Rules of Engagement by Catherine Bush: This book has a dual – an actual dual with pistols in 1990s Toronto. It’s a pretty quintessential Can-lit novel with characters walking around the leafy Rosedale/ravine-esque parts of Toronto and also ex-patting to London. Apparently (just checking now to see when it was published), I bought it from Amazon on January 1, 2004. I could have sworn I bought a used copy. Perhaps the amazon one was for a gift? I can’t recall. I do know I read a review of the book in a newspaper (The Ottawa Citizen maybe, back when they did book reviews. I don’t think they do anymore) and then thought about it for years before I managed to read it.

    Amazon is temporarily unable to display my orders, so I can’t tell how/why/who the 2004 copy was purchased. This is one of the books that I wished I wrote.

So that’s that. Books sticking with me. Now off to bake cookies and do some writing exercises.

book reviewing stress

I requested too many books from Netgalley that came through (new Jonathan Coe!), but now I’m stressed about reading and reviewing them all before they expire.

Why do I do this to myself? I need to put a tattoo on the back on my hand saying Stop attempting more than you can do, except to do so would mean adding another item to my to-do list (get a tattoo) and my to-do list is long enough as is, I mean, for someone who doesn’t have 9-5 employment or a steady income.

a bad library user confession

So it’s happened.

The first time in thirty-four years.

The last time it almost happened, I was five, but we eventually found it, behind the frame of a picture that hung alongside the staircase. It was determined that someone had kicked it over the stairs and it had lodged behind there. Much later, one of my sister or I kicked a pair of scissors the same way, which went careening down into the goldfish tank and hit one of Bert or Ernie (I was an kid raised on television; what can I say?), who swam tilted over for quite some time before he finally righted himself and went back to being an upright goldfish.

I have lost a library book.

I think we left it where we were staying last week on holiday. I emailed the proprietress and told her, should it turn up, the book can be returned to any library in the province (yay full-across-the-province library system). But I have yet to hear a response (actually, no one I’ve emailed in the past week and a half has emailed me back. What’s up with people taking summer breaks and not attending to my needy needs?) so I am not hopeful.

Now I have to go and shamefully reveal my trespass to Allan the librarian, who will shake his head and look at me like maybe I don’t deserve to take out any more books ever. But then whose books will you put on the hold pick-up shelf Allan? I always have books on that shelf.

So goodbye Burning Your Boats Collected Stories of Angela Carter. I wanted to read you and was judged, by my inability to gather up all my detritus, to be unworthy of the task.

Also, we seem to have left Og behind. If anyone is in need of a present for Tesfa, here you go.

Classics Club Spin

See here.

I decided to do all the ladies this time. My list:

  1. The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood
  2. Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston
  3. Mrs Dalloway by Virginia Wolfe
  4. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
  5. Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe
  6. The Complete Stories by Flannery O’Connor
  7. Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë
  8. The Devil’s Pool by George Sand
  9. The Garden Party and Other Stories by Katherine Mansfield
  10. A Tree Grows in Brooklyn by Betty Smith
  11. The Bloody Chamber by Angela Carter
  12. Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys
  13. North and South by Elizabeth Gaskell
  14. Mansfield Park by Jane Austen
  15. Middlemarch by George Eliot
  16. Beloved by Toni Morrison
  17. I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou
  18. The Collected Stories of Colette by Colette
  19. The Awakening by Kate Chopin
  20. The House of Mirth by Edith Wharton

The number will be picked on August 11th. So stay tuned.

Top Ten Tuesday: Top Ten Authors You Own The Most Books Of

I took this from Reading in Bed. I think, dear reader, you could save a lot of time on this blog if you simply read Reading in Bed, since I take the memes she does and I read the books she reviews (much more competent reviews than my own) and basically am just a creepy internet follower/stalker, so maybe you should be reading her. Like right now. Go and read it (but maybe open it in a new tab in case you still want to read here).

So I made a list of the ten ten authors I own the most books of. Since I have five Billy bookcases, plus another bookcase in Tesfa’s room, plus books strewn around the house, plus no organisation to our books whatsoever, this took a little work. I included books that are Geoff’s because Geoff is always saying that they aren’t my books and his books, but they are our books. He says it a lot. Underlined books in the lists below are books I have not read, so likely astute readers can determine which books are our books but less so mine.

Honourable Mentions (5 $$\le x \le 7$$): Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (5), Graham Greene (5), Michael Ondaatje (5), John Irving (5), Robert J. Sawyer (5), Anton Chekhov (5), Judy Blume (5), Lloyd Alexander (5), Mo Willems (5), Margaret Atwood (6), Douglas Adams (6), Minette Walters (6), Warren Ellis (6), Mordechai Richler (6), Robertson Davies (7), Jim Benton (7).

And I have to do twelve authors, just because I have four authors with eight books each.

12. George R. R. Martin (8 books): Fevre Dream, A Game of Thrones, A Clash of Kings, A Storm of Swords, A Feast for Crows, A Dance With Dragons, Windhaven (with Lisa Tuttle), Dreamsongs Bundle Volumes I and II;

11. Douglas Coupland (8 books): JPod, Microserfs, Generation X, The Gum Thief, Shampoo Planet, Polaroids from the Dead, Worst. Person. Ever., Life After God;

10. Neil Gaiman (8 books): The Doll’s House, Dream Country, Seasons of Mists, A Game of You, Brief Lives, Endless Nights, Coraline, Fortunately The Milk;

9. John Le Carré (8 books): The Honourable Schoolboy, The Spy Who Came In From The Cold, The Constant Gardener, A Small Town in Germany, Our Kind of Traitor, Three Complete Novels (Call for the Dead, A Murder of Quality, The Spy Who Came In From The Cold), Absolute Friends, A Delicate Truth;

8. Philip K. Dick (9 books): The Man In The High Castle, The Short Happy Life of the Brown Oxford, Eye in the Sky, The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldrich, Minority Report, Galactic Pot Healer, Ubik, Solar Lottery, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?;

7. Joseph Conrad (9 books): Under Western Eyes, Nostromo, Three Short Novels, Lord Jim, Suspense, Chance, Heart of Darkness, The Nigger of the Narcissus, The Secret Agent;

6. Dr Seuss/Theo LeSieg (10 books): Ten Apples Up On Top, One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish, Fox in Socks, In a People House, Dr Seuss’ ABCs, Hop on Pop, Green Eggs and Ham, Horray for Diffendoofer Day (with Jack Prelutsky), And To Think That I Saw It On Mulberry Street, The 500 Hats of Bartholomew Cubbins;

5. Beverly Cleary (11 books): Henry Huggins, Henry and Beezus, Beezus and Ramona, Ramona the Pest, Ramona the Brave, Ramona and Her Father, Ramona and Her Mother, Ramona Quimby Age 8, Ramona Forever, Ramona’s World, Dear Mr Henshaw;

4. Roald Dahl (11 books): Tales of the Unexpected, Someone Like You, Ah Sweet Mystery of Life, The Wonderful World of Henry Sugar, Matilda, Fantastic Mr Fox, The BFG, James and the Giant Peach, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, The Twits, The Witches;

3. CS Lewis (11 books): Mere Christianity, Out of the Silent Planet, Perelandra, That Hideous Strength, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, Prince Caspian, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, The Silver Chair, The Horse and His Boy, The Magician’s Nephew, The Last Battle;

2. William Shakespeare (12 books): The Norton Shakespeare, Love’s Labour’s Lost, Twelfth Night, Troilus and Cressida, Two Gentleman of Verona, Much Ado About Nothing, King Lear, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, The Late Romances (Pericles, Cymbeline, A Winter’s Tale, The Tempest), Titus Andronicus and Timon of Athens, Three Tragedies (Hamlet, Macbeth, King Lear), Othello;

And….

1. Agatha Christie (55 books): Yeah, I’m not writing all of those out. Come over to my house and I’ll show you the shelf if you’re really interested.

twenty-five years in the making

Anyone else remember these books?

They were a staple of grade school libraries and Scholastic orders in the eighties. One of my friends had the whole set at home and while I was supremely jealous, I was also cognizant that whenever I tried to follow the origami instructions, I never quite ended up with anything more than a folded and crumbled piece of paper that, at best, vaguely resembled an asteroid or a hair ball.

Around that time, I came into the possession of a thick envelope full of origami paper. I know it was my aunt’s at one point, and I’m going to assume that she willingly gave it to me, but I can’t think of why she would due to my already-mentioned inability to fold paper in any way beautiful. I wonder if maybe I just took the envelope of origami paper. If so, I’m sorry Aunt S. I had somewhat sticky fingers as a kid.

Even with my origami inability well-established, I kept this envelope for years. It moved with me wherever I went. After living at home (Ottawa), I took it to university (Waterloo), grad school (Halifax), Hell (Calgary), failed attempt at being a worker bee (Ottawa again), and finally here (New Brunswick). I used some of the paper for crafts with Tesfa, but most of the time, the envelope sat on a bookshelf, upright like a book, forgotten about.

Until…

The Japanese exchange students went to Tesfa’s camp on Wednesday and showed the kids how to do some simple origami. Tesfa was enthused. She came home and told us she wanted to do more origami. Okay. Super. I can finally use the origami paper I’ve been moving around for twenty-five years!

But Tesfa was adamant on one point: she wants to do origami from a book, not from instructions on the computer. So on Thursday, she and Geoff set out to the library to find origami books and came home with the one you see above. My nemesis come back to haunt me.

But…. tada:

origami 001

Please ignore the blurriness of the picture. Tesfa insisted I take it while she was sitting on a stability ball.

I MADE SOMETHING FROM ONE OF THOSE ORIGAMI BOOKS! The book tells me it’s a water bird rather than any specific water bird, so feel free to decide it is a duck or a swan or a loon or I’m out of water birds, so I don’t know.

So take that books that foiled me when I was nine. I’m smarter than you now!

the light on The Luminaries

One: I’m writing this post with a moderate migraine lodged behind my right eye. Probably I should lay down and not strain my eyes staring further at a screen, but migraines often make me more obsessive than usual, and I’ve got it in my head that I’m going to write my thoughts on The Luminaries today since I finished it last night and if I procrastinate, I’ll never get it done. And this book took me over a week to read. That’s a very long time for me to read a book. It’s long and heavy (the book, in terms of pages and weight). Be warned.

Now Two to $$\omega$$: My thoughts on The Luminaries.

I never really know how to rate long books. Even in long books that I end up despising (for example House of Leaves), generally there are sections that I enjoyed (there are some good spooky bits when they go exploring into the house). Similarly, in long books that I love a little more than should be allowed (Infinite Jest), there are always sections that are little more than flaming excrement (The Ebonics Chapter).

I also never know how to rate novels that I’m not enamoured with, but not because the novel is inherently bad or low-quality. I don’t want to rate lowly because the book didn’t personally grab me the whole way through, but do I rate a book highly because I can see its genius even if I was a bit meh overall? I think David Sexton’s review says it best:

Let’s concede that The Luminaries is a stunning feat of construction. The Booker judges knew, whatever else its merits, they were giving the prize to a tremendously technically accomplished piece of work

(although I think the next few sentences he writes are a bit too vitriolic. But, funnily Sexton had a similar experience to me in that he got to about page 150 while he was on holiday and then started to really question whether it was worth continuing. I don’t know where Sexton was vacationing, but I was in a yurt in Fundy National Park.)

This is an precisely constructed novel. The book is full of clever schemes. I’m usually old-hat at figuring out clever schemes, but these ones were beyond my Agatha Christie-honed skills. I appreciate that. I appreciate clever novels and clever twists, but then less so when there’s suddenly a bunch of astrological silliness about entwined fates. I don’t mind ghost or horror stories, but I’d rather be in-all on a paranormal story than just side plot for two (maybe three depending on how you count it) characters. But the idea of The Fates leads into the novel’s main theme of fortune, and, as I think it says on the dust-jacket, fortune in every sense: making a fortune, telling fortunes (as with the astrological symbols), being fortunate (lucky), the whims of fortune. But the coincidences the Fates/Stars/Deities throw at the characters start to feel contrived, no matter how many characters, in a self-aware, post-modern way, discuss how odd all these coincidences are.

And of course characters. Like with The Lifeboat, which I read this Spring, there are so many characters. I know that 19th century novels are supposed to be like a subway going downtown at rush-hour, but there are so many characters and I don’t know enough about gold rushes to be able to one hundred percent distinguish their jobs. What’s the difference between a shipping agent and a commission agent? Why is the gaoler also the Commissioner? Are those separate jobs? Did somewhere earlier in the book tell me that? Some characters could have likely been combined if slimness had been a goal (maybe Sook Yongsheng and Quee Long, maybe Thomas Balfour and Charlie Frost, maybe any of the other two Caucasian men). But there are twelve men there for the Zodiac so combining them means the book loses that structure which ties back into the idea of fortune, which in turn goes back to the parts of the book I liked the least.

What I liked best: The spelling of connexion, which is always how I spelled connection until, one afternoon sitting in OAC Chemistry, a poster told me that I should have been spelling connextion as connection, which I then switched to to avoid embarassing spelling-related incidents (obviously the poster was not about spelling the word connection and likely had something to do with chemical bonds and my Chemistry partner might have alerted me to that poster because of my spelling of connexion on our lab report, I don’t rightly recall).

All of this is a long-winded way of saying what I said much more succinctly when I reviewed Catton’s first novel The Rehearsal:

Sometimes I read novels and get mad that I am not writing novels because I want to write novels like this one. Well, most of the time. The rest of the time it felt more like a technical piece than anything enjoyable – sort of like eating kale, you know it’s good for you but you’d really rather have the cake.

So I rated The Luminaries the same as I rated The Rehearsal – 4.5/5. Don’t expect me to write anything as long or as clever as this either.





Man, writing reviews is hard. I always sound so pedantic. So much for my career as a book reviewer having publishers send me free books to review.