Review of Beneath the Silence by Charlene Carr

I am totally rooting for Charlene Carr. An Ontario girl who moved East, a bunch of degrees, aspiring writer, so basically me except competent and has actually managed to write some novels. Plus, Beneath the Silence is the first time anyone has solicited me to review their book. W00t w00t; I’m moving up in the reviews-for-free-books world!

Beneath the Silence isn’t the sort of book I would normally pick up. I realized that after I started reading it. The writing style is more mainstream than what I usually pick and the characterizations a bit more YA-styled than I generally look for. But reading it made me feel like seventh grade again. I’m not going to lie: seventh grade me swooned a couple of times. I can imagine being totally in love with Gabe, the way I was totally in love with a picture in the copy of The Eyes of the Dragon I got at a middle-school book fair. I would have reveled in the teen anger and angst of Brooke. I would have thought the names, Brooke and River Lake, to be the epitome of cleveness. As an adult, I can’t say I found the same sort of magic, but it let me pretend. Sometimes pretending on a rainy summer’s day is perfect.

There’s a lot of good in the book: it surprised me. I complain constantly about figuring out plot points pages before they happen. I did figure out some (like about the car accident and Molly), but there were other little ones that I wasn’t expecting (like at the house party, which had train-wreck written all over it, but ended much differently). There’s a completely mortifying period story, which makes you want Carr to be one of your girlfriends because she can tell a story like that. The book is uplifting. I know normally when a book is uplifting, I’m usually really down on it, but I willingly accepted the life-affirmingness of the story. It’s spiritual without being cloying; in a way, the book is a meditation on forgiveness.

There’s also the, I don’t want to say bad because it isn’t really bad, the mediocre: I’m not sure whether I believe all of Molly’s story, with the clichés of a hooker with a heart of gold, a tumble-down the stairs miscarriage, a prince in the wings willing to wait for our heroine. Believe is the wrong word again (there’s a reason Carr has managed to write a book while I sit here with a thesaurus trying to figure out what exactly it is I am trying to say). There was something about Montréal that was too pat. It’s like a tiny lump in a bedspread. You could just slop down and ignore it or you could be, like me, annoyed to no end by it.

Plus the book taught me there was an IMAX theatre in Halifax. I did not know that. So learning new things while expanding the type of books I normally read. Entertainment and information!

Beneath the Silence by Charlene Carr went on sale July 9, 2015.

I kind of received a copy free from the author in exchange for an honest review.

Review of Etta and Otto and Russell and James by Emma Hooper

Yes, I am behind in my reviews. Waaaaaay behind. I’m trying to catch up. My goal is two reviews a week until the end of the summer, and then we’ll see whether I’m any better situated.

***

Is there currently a glut of seniors wandering off books right now? Granted, I can only think of three, including this one (The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry and The 100 Year Old Man …), so glut might be a bit strong, but I can’t help thinking that we are currently obsessed with old people who simply get up and walk away, because, yes, in Etta and Otto and Russell and James, we have a senior, Etta, who gets up and walks away.

We’re in Canada, walking with Etta from Saskatchewan as she attempts to get to Halifax. She makes a coyote friend. The unrequited lover follows her. The husband waits. It’s three hundred pages but there is a lot of blank space. Negative space? Non-space? Amidst the blank lines, we have the beginning, a typical 1930s, 1940s prairie tale of one room schoolhouses and tractor accidents and dust and men going off to war and flat fields with red sunrises. It’s somewhat of a disservice to call this past-part a paint-by-numbers prairie novel, but it’s a paint-by-numbers prairie novel. Of course, that doesn’t mean the book isn’t genuinely affecting, but it’s sort of like a mild soap of a book. Unobjectionable. Less jaded people would use the word heartwarming.

Interspersed with then, the book has now, with Etta walking. She walks. I don’t know what else to say about that.

But the in-between is missing, obscured by the blank lines. There is the beginning, there is the end, but the middle? What happened between 1945 and now? Nothing Hooper felt worth noting as there is nary a mention of it. As I slide into middle age myself, I worry if that’s all I have to look forward to until I turn eighty? Just blankness, not even worth remembering? How sad.

There’s a metaphysical ending. Not a fan of those, but I know other people like the uncertainty, the non-requirement of closure. I think a lot of literary first novels, of which Etta and Otto and Russell and James is one, have endings like this. Maybe it’s writers still finding their way. I wished the ending was more solid and less ethereal though. And I wanted more about Owen, who was far more interesting than Otto ever was. Otto doesn’t even go after his wife. Sort of a lump.

Etta and Otto and Russell and James by Emma Hooper went on sale January 20, 2015.

I kind of received a copy free from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review, in that they approved my request after the title was archived, so I couldn’t actually download it. Instead, I took a copy out of the library. I emailed Netgalley to ask what was up with that, but they never replied, so I don’t know.

on differences in parenting

Today I was made aware that some people view Roald Dahl’s Matilda as a brat.

Obviously these people are wrong. Matilda is exquisite.

Still, I am really, unbearably sad about this. It’s like someone bruised my heart. I am all those Rennaissance pictures of Saint Sebastien pierced by arrows through the heart, but without the choice saintliness.

Please keep your negative opinions about Matilda to yourself.

this is a good idea right?

I should write down every single one of my books? I mean catalogue them. Just because the last time I decided to do something with my books and it seemed like a good idea when I started (and also had a low-grade fever which is likely why I thought it would be a good idea) and then I realized what a waste of time it was, doesn’t mean this will be too, yes?

I’ll let you know in two weeks, when I finish likely, how I could have better spent my time on Wolf Children.

take that!

Except for the fact that I’m now pretty sure I don’t know what to do with this, I put one of my Wolf Children characters in quarantine because she was annoying me. Or the story was annoying me. Or life was annoying me. Whatever.

Don’t really know what the point of my doing that was, story-wise, because now I’ve either got to backtrack and not put her in quarantine, or who knows. Stupid Wolf Children story. I keep trying to abandon it, but then I feel like I should at least finish one draft so I’ll stop having to think about it.

June 2015

Happy Jingoism Day! And back to June:

I read:

Thoughts:

  • Bent by Teri Louise Kelly: Reviewed earlier this month. For some reason, I always think the last name is Marsh. I wonder why.
  • Cam Jansen and the Mystery of the Stolen Corn Popper by David A. Adler: You mean they had Cam Jansen when you were a kid? says my kid. Um yeah, this book was published in 1986, so yes, I did have Cam Jansen around when I was a kid.
  • Unicorn on a Roll by Dana Simpson: Reviewed earlier this month.
  • Life After Life by Kate Atkinson: A re-read in preparation for A God In Ruins. I liked it less the second time, and it was just as hard to get past the first hundred pages the second time as the first as the pages are are like having one’s head banged against a concrete wall. And I’m still not enamored about the fact that the life in which Ursula is raped, it destroys everything after it. I am in no way dismissing the trauma of rape, more tired of the trope of the fallen women who can never redeem herself.
  • A God In Ruins by Kate Atkinson: There’s a bitterness to this book that makes it hard to like the book. I know likability isn’t really the point, but this book was really pointy-elbows-out uncomfortable. Thinking about it now, two weeks post-reading, I’m not really satisfied with the ending. I expect more of Kate Atkinson than the ending she gave. Hmph.

    Of course, I still love you Kate Atkinson. You can be in my list of famous people who are my friends but don’t know it yet (Amy Poehler, Mindy Kaling, Vin Diesel, etc.).
  • Woes of the True Policeman by Robert Bolaño: Every Bolaño book I read means there is one less Bolaño book I get to read for the first time 🙁 Plus I now have memorized the code to write ñ on the computer (Alt-164).
  • Elementary Particles by Michel Houellebecq: This was less caustic as maybe being less famous and this being one of his earlier works, his editors snipped a lot of it out? In any case, try Soumission in French or wait for an English translation?
  • The Cat by Edeet Ravel: If you ever need proof that I read depressing books, here’s a book I read about a disfigured woman whose son dies and she can’t kill herself because she has to take care of her son’s beloved cat. All that for an ending that comes out of nowhere and for no reason. Plus it’s set in Guelph, a city I hate for the sole reason that sometimes the Kitchener-Toronto Greyhound winds its way through Guelph and it takes bloody forever, like a whole other hour, to get to Toronto. I used to hate that when I lived in Waterloo. Hence my dislike of Guelph.
  • A Judgement in Stone by Ruth Rendell: This book actually has an Italian character who cries “Mamma mia!” likely slapping her hands to her cheeks as she does so. And so we have an anthropological/sociological study of the prejudices of an upper-middle class British author in the 1970s.

    It does not age well.
  • The Thrilling Life of Pauline De Lammermoor by Edeet Ravel: I’m pretty sure this is set in Guelph too, even though the town is called something else. Stupid Guelph.
  • Dog Boy by Eva Hornung: I wanted to read this for a long time. So I read it. I should have read it right when I found out about it, rather than have my expectations build up. It was solid. I gave it four out of five. But it wasn’t miraculous, likely because I waited too long.

Favourite book of the month:

Continuing to lose myself in Bolaño’s universe.

Most promising book on the wishlist:

Internet tells me this book is great. I’ll probably leave it for four years, like Dog Boy, let the expectation of greatness simmer, and then be disappointed in 2019 that it wasn’t as transcendent as I thought it would be.




I watched:




I wrote:

Wolf Children Chapters One and Four and tentative starts on Chapter Two. Faerie story review. Fiddling with older short stories and submitting them here and there. I plan to be rejected from every major Canadian literary journal before my writing time is through!

edge of knowledge

Last week I helped someone with their pre-calc homework. Just parabola problems, little tricks, but kind of fun, reminding me why I used to like math way back in high school. I’d like to think I explained things well enough — it being over facebook rather than in person. Maybe that’s telling me something.

So I thought a bit about mathematics this week. It seems strange that, at twenty-four through to thirty-two, I was at the edge of knowledge. I published papers and did stuff. Now, I meander about helping out high school math now and then and pretending things. I pretend things all the time. Remembering my dull dreams (actual zzzz sleep dreams not goals and wishes), expanding them, or just making shit up. I make a lot of shit up. I tell myself stories to go to sleep at night. Maybe that’s why my dreams are so dull, because my imagination is already overactive.

But I used to be at the edge of knowledge before I decided to just play around in pretend-land. For some reason, this past week, reconciling the two has been more difficult than I anticipated.